Posts Tagged ‘Terry Eagleton’
Sunday Morning Post-Rapture Links
* Pharyngula, buzzkill, makes the whole “Rapture” craze this weekend seem a lot less funny. At least we’ll always have alternative_eschatology.jpg.
* The headline reads: “Utah law makes acting sexy illegal.” Just don’t tell the atheists.
* How a third-party Palin run might benefit the GOP.
* How the Big Bird puppet works. I don’t know that I ever really thought enough about this to have a “theory” on how Big Bird works, but I definitely thought Big Bird was more of a suit than a puppet—which I realize in retrospect is about as close to “I always thought Big Bird was real” as an adult can comfortably get.
* Mitch Daniels won’t run. This is very good news for Pawlenty, who looks increasingly unbeatable—though a number of my right-wing relatives who used to think experience was the most important qualification for the presidency seem quite enraptured with pizza magnate Herman Cain. The rest of my Republican relatives appear, unbelievably, to be waiting for Jeb.
* Mark Schmitt on intergenerational warfare from Paul Ryan and the GOP. Via Matt Yglesias, who highlights once again the centrality of 1973/1974 as the key turning point in U.S. economic and political history.
* More intergenerational warfare from the GOP: Newt wants poll tests for “young people.”
* And a single, striking thought: what if all the objections to Marx’s thought are mistaken?
Sunday Night Links
Sunday night links.
* Details on the Franklin Center’s Sun Ra event this Friday.
* Nigeria has banned District 9.
* Consumer electronics and the Jevons Paradox.
* Atheists: we’re #1.
* See also: Terry Eagleton and “religion for radicals.”
* Does this video from College Humor mean it’s now okay to joke about 9/11?
* And a Daily Kos diary on Ayn Rand.
Interestingly, despite her general disdain for humanity, there were people she seemed to admire greatly, such as William Edward Hickman, whose credo, “What is good for me is right,” she described in her Journals as, “The best and strongest expression of a real man’s psychology I have heard.” But Hickman was no simple expositor of personal greed and self-interest; no mere modern day libertarian; no pedestrian practitioner of excessive self-love. No indeed. He was a sociopathic murderer. In 1927 he kidnapped a 12-year old girl from a school in Los Angeles by the name of Marian Parker, chopped off her legs, cut our her internal organs, drained all of her blood and then spread parts of her body all over the city.
Of Hickman, this sick murderer, Rand had almost nothing but positive things to say.
Other Stuff
Other stuff.
* Jaimee has a piece in the Indy Green Guide this week comparing dueling energy initiatives in the North Carolina State Legislature.
* Begging as labor: Alex Greenberg thinks it over.
* Science fiction’s most evil corporations.
* Hope for Dollhouse? ‘Prison Break return disappoints,’ scoring 75% of Dollhouse‘s regular audience in the Friday night death slot.
* The Brick Testament has reached The Book of Revelations.
* “Metaphysics in a Time of Terrorism,” by Terry Eagleton. Via MeFi.
The distinction between Hitchens or Dawkins and those like myself comes down in the end to one between liberal humanism and tragic humanism. There are those who hold that if we can only shake off a poisonous legacy of myth and superstition, we can be free. Such a hope in my own view is itself a myth, though a generous-spirited one. Tragic humanism shares liberal humanism’s vision of the free flourishing of humanity, but holds that attaining it is possible only by confronting the very worst. The only affirmation of humanity ultimately worth having is one that, like the disillusioned post-Restoration Milton, seriously wonders whether humanity is worth saving in the first place, and understands Swift’s king of Brobdingnag with his vision of the human species as an odious race of vermin. Tragic humanism, whether in its socialist, Christian, or psychoanalytic varieties, holds that only by a process of self-dispossession and radical remaking can humanity come into its own. There are no guarantees that such a transfigured future will ever be born. But it might arrive a little earlier if liberal dogmatists, doctrinaire flag-wavers for Progress, and Islamophobic intellectuals got out of its way.
*Think Progress says “Obama’s Immunity For CIA Agents Still Leaves Prosecutions Of Senior Bushies On The Table.” People need to accept that Obama’s going to let us down on this. He told us he would. He will.
* Your taxes at work. See also.
* A major EPA ruling this week declared carbon dioxide a pollutant under the Clean Air Act. More analysis at the Oil Drum.
* Imagine finding yourself aboard a burning ocean liner. An increasing number of people are trying to put it out — and they stand a good chance, if they can get access to the fire axes and hoses. Unfortunately, some rich old fat guys are sitting in deck chairs blocking the equipment, enjoying drinks and appetizers, and every time the other passengers try to get them to move, the rich old fat guys say they don’t really believe in the fire, and even if it does exist, it probably can’t be put out so we should just trust in the new lifeboat being built. And, sure enough, there on the deck is a guy is a brilliant, somewhat unworldly professor, busily sketching a design for a new lifeboat as the smoke billows in larger and larger clouds.
Gerry Canavan 