Posts Tagged ‘Robert Menendez’
TuesNi
* A slim majority of Americans now agree that homosexuality is not immoral. Break out the champagne!
* ABC wants you to know that the characters on Lost were not dead the whole time. Please be advised.
* Related: n+1 argues Lost is the last great scripted drama.
* Tonight’s BP links: It turns out BP screwed up the Exxon Valdez disaster too. They had no plan. No one has much of a plan now. What BP does not want you to see: oil and chemical dispersants swirling together into a toxic soup, forming large plumes under the surface of the water as deep as twenty-five feet, perhaps deeper. Chris Hayes v. “accidents happen.” And New Jersey Sen. Bob Menendez has put forward legislation that would lift BP’s liability cap; I predict this eventually passes.
* And you had me at invisible sharks.
3/16.2
* Update from yesterday: running marathons will also kill you. Don’t do that either!
* Update from two weeks ago: a New Jersey appeals court has ruled Tea Party supporters in New Jersey can try to recall Robert Menendez despite the fact that no recall procedure exists for federal legislators under the Constitution.
* NBC polls puts health care support at 46-45. Some day, I suspect, this bill may actually pass.
* Related: By this time next week we’ll have seen huge headlines about health care. These headlines will either read “Democrats do it!”, followed by various Republicans and their apologists complaining that what the Dems did wasn’t nice, or “Democrats — losers again”, followed by Republicans going bwahahaha.
And it’s up to a handful of Democrats to decide which headlines we get. They’re out of their minds if they don’t choose door #1. (via)
* Also related, some breaking news: Major legislative breakthroughs are always controversial!
* If you ever watched the This American Life TV show, you might remember Mark Hogancamp, who built a replica World-War-II-era village in his backyard as a means of dealing with being brutally assaulted outside a bar. His story is now a feature-length documentary. (via)
* Wow: Two sources at the Science Times section of the New York Times have told me that a majority of the section’s editorial staff doubts that human-induced global warming represents a serious threat to humanity. So this is why we can’t have nice things. (via)
* More actually existing media bias: CNN hires goat f**king child molester.
* FantasySCOTUS: Who will replace Judge Stevens if he retires?
* And Greensboro in the news! An “equipment failure” caused preview clips for adult programming to appear on two channels dedicated for kids in North Carolina, a spokeswoman for Time Warner Cable Inc. said today.
Tea Partiers, Jersey, Cheney, Scalia, Guns, 2010, RNC
* Tea Party supporters in New Jersey try to recall Robert Menendez despite the fact that no recall procedure exists for federal legislators under the Constitution. New Jersey Democratic Chairman John Wisniewski is angry about it:
“The attempt to recall Senator Menendez is an affront to the voters of New Jersey and has no standing in law. One day these folks are trying to disprove human evolution, the next day they are challenging the constitutionality of the Constitution. These are radical people who chose Menendez off of a list of Democrats because of the sound of his last name.”
Via Daily Kos.
* Inside the RNC’s secret fundraising strategy memo.
The small donors who are the targets of direct marketing are described under the heading “Visceral Giving.” Their motivations are listed as “fear;” “Extreme negative feelings toward existing Administration;” and “Reactionary.”
Major donors, by contrast, are treated in a column headed “Calculated Giving.” Their motivations include: “Peer to Peer Pressure”; “access”; and “Ego-Driven.”
And yet it’s the Left that’s supposed to be condescending and arrogant. Conor Friedersdorf is pretty unhappy about all this.
* Former DNC Chair Howard Dean says the pundits are misreading 2010: the mood is anti-incumbent, not anti-Democrat.
* Firedoglake gets nostalgic for the Cheney doctrine, which says we should invade other countries at the slightest probability of danger but apparently doesn’t apply to protecting the only planet we will ever have.
* And The Wall Street Journal, of all places: So Where’s Your Originalism Now, Justice Scalia?
Justice Scalia insisted that the right to keep and bear arms is right there in the text, which of course is true. But so too is the Privileges or Immunities Clause, which, unlike the Court’s due process jurisprudence, has a historical meaning that helps define and limit the rights it was meant to protect.
At the McDonald argument, it seemed obvious that five or more justices will vote to apply the Second Amendment to the states. . . . But it was also obvious that most were deeply afraid of following a text whose original meaning might lead them where they do not want to go.
Via MyDD. More on the Chicago gun case at SCOTUSblog.