Posts Tagged ‘Proposition 8’
Friday Night in London Links
* The gods heard we were coming: Runaway Subway Blows Through Six Tube Stations with No Driver.
* If you get all your legal analysis from my friend @drbluman, you already know that the Right might be better off not even contesting the recent Prop 8 decision restoring marriage equality in California.
* Hack your brain: Researchers from New Mexico State University’s College of Business used a strip of duct tape to make a line through the middle of shopping carts in a Las Cruces, N.M., grocery store. They also posted a sign on each cart that recommended that fruits and vegetables be placed on one side of the line. Shoppers who had one of the special carts bought 102 percent more fruits and veggies than those who had regular carts. Despite the change in shopping habits, the special carts didn’t change the amount of overall money the shoppers were spending.
* Louie Gohmert’s “terror babies!” freakout on CNN is hilarious until killjoy Steve Benen reminds you that he’ll probably get a leadership position after Republicans take back the House next year.
* Great post from Matt Yglesias exposing the lunacy of trying to budget 70 years in advance:
Turn your time machine seventy years back in time and consider the fate of a member of congress in 1940 trying to eliminate the national debt by 2010.
He’d have a hard time taking account of America’ entrance in World War II, the end of the war, the start of the Cold War, the “small” Korean and Vietnam wars, the collapse of the Soviet Union, the decision to maintain a global military presence, 9/11, Iraq, etc. And that’s to say nothing of the creation of Medicare, the substantial expansion of Social Security, the creation of Medicaid, the inflation of the 1970, the Great Recession of 2007-2010, etc., etc., etc. Long story short, he’d be flying blind. In 1940, out of 35 million private homes over 10 million lacked running water. In 2010, 60 percent of households have broadband internet.
* And the BBC, reporting from the mid-1980s, discovers that college professors are using popular culture artifacts like comic books in the classroom.
The Constitution Says What Anthony Kennedy Says It Says
If you want justice in America, first you have to convince this 74-year-old man. It’s what the Founders intended. UPDATE: More on this subject via Steve Benen.
Sunday Afternoon
* New York Times: At UNC, every night is ladies’ night. Via BloggEd, who adds: At my college, the U. of Delaware, the numbers are almost identical: 58 percent female for years, and 60 percent in the largest college, Arts and Sciences. It’s that way most everywhere, other than super-elite colleges and ones that emphasize engineering and the like. Some time back, I posted on how the gender imbalance may play out in admissions offices: affirmative action for boys—the suspicion of which has led to an ongoing investigation of 19 schools by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.
* The New York Review of Books has a brief history of Facebook.
* The Onion‘s A.V. Club has a feature on Bill Murray and philosophy.
* The San Francisco Gate reports the “open secret” that the judge in the highly contentious Prop 8 trial is gay, though the response from the right demonstrates that this was actually a somewhat guarded secret.
* And, via @socratic, the Raw Story has today’s first paragraph FAIL:
New Orleans has elected its first white mayor in 32 years, ushering in hopes of a new era in a city still trying to rebuild five years after Hurricane Katrina.
Perhaps you should consider rephrasing that…
A Little Later Tuesday Afternoon
* Books and magazines are apparently no longer allowed on flights to and from Canada. Because, you know, freedom.
* If you consider a stash of obscene videos scarier than a stash of firearms then this is the country for you. In America you have a constitutional right to own a gun, and you may traffic in firearms with legal impunity; but you risk being imprisoned for buying and selling arguably obscene pornography. And don’t even think about child porn (I mean that literally): possessing obscene cartoon images of imaginary children is a federal offense; so is communicating your sexual fantasies about children to other adults… Freedom! Via Srinivas.
* Great moments in bad science reporting: This weird article takes an interesting physiological result—that “men’s subjective ratings of arousal were in agreement with their body’s level of sexual arousal about 66 percent of the time, while women’s were in line only about 26 percent of the time”—and packages it inside a completely bizarre, misogynist frame: that women “may not know” when they are aroused. What?
* There’s currently an activist fight over whether or not to allow cameras into the upcoming Proposition 8 trial in California next week. I’m much more interested in the ruling than in my ability to see it happen, sincerely hoping it turns out that Prop 8 was never legal in the first place.
* h+ interviews Ray Kurzweil.
* And behold, Pocahontar. Via Boing Boing.
Roundup
Late-night roundup.
* Senate Republicans won’t fight Sotomayor.
* Gay-rights activists are balking at taking Prop 8 to federal court; they think they’ll lose at the Supremes given the courts’ current composition.
* 15 Sexist Vintage Ads. So glad sexism is behind us.
O’Reilly v. Hertzberg
O’Reilly v. Hertzberg. An intriguing behind-the-scenes look either at a just crusade for fair treatment of Newt Gingrich or else at what it’s like to be on the receiving end of a Bill O’Reilly smearjob, depending on whether or not you know the meaning of the word “fascism.” (Thanks, td!)
Proposition 8: The Musical
Proposition 8: The Musical.
Prop 8 Update
The California Supreme Court agreed Wednesday to consider complaints by opponents of Proposition 8 that it improperly revised the constitution to ban gay marriage. The court declined to stay its enforcement in the meantime.
Court spokeswoman Lynn Holton said the court asked the parties involved to write briefs arguing three issues:
(1) Is Proposition 8 invalid because it constitutes a revision of, rather than an amendment to, the California Constitution?
(2) Does Proposition 8 violate the separation-of-powers doctrine under the California Constitution?
(3) If Proposition 8 is not unconstitutional, what is its effect, if any, on the marriages of same-sex couples performed before the adoption of Proposition 8?
Holton said the court established an expedited briefing schedule. She said oral argument could be held as early as March 2009. (via MyDD)
California, Still Leading the Way on Some Things
California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on Monday signed an executive order that would speed up renewable energy development and require 33 percent of utilities’ electrical power to come from renewable sources by 2030.
California, still leading the way on some things.
Tonight’s Special Comment
Olbermann’s special comment on Prop 8. KO’s characteristic melodrama aside, I have to agree with him: it boggles my mind that this is an argument we are having as a nation, that there is anyone, anywhere, who could actually oppose marriage equality. I can’t begin to understand it. I suppose I’m impatient—GLBT issues have made tremendous progress even since the 1990s, and in a few years this will all be (almost) over—but this is really a struggle I just wish we could skip to the end of.
At one point I was hopeful that Prop 8 would be the first big victory for our side. I’m still upset it wasn’t. Keith is, in the end, right: this vote is horrible.