Posts Tagged ‘magic’
* From the archives: Vonnegut on hearing the voice of God on Armistice Day. Image from @watsdn.
* The Humanities Must Unite or Die. “And.”
* A mind-bending, award-winning science fiction trilogy that expertly investigates the way we live now. I’m quite late, but I’ve been looking forward to reading these. Perhaps I’ll start tonight!
* ‘I’m praying for you’: MSF posts grim details from Afghan hospital strike. U.S. Journalists Who Instantly Exonerated Their Government of the Kunduz Hospital Attack, Declaring it an “Accident.”
* As it turns out, the non-profit co-op model for health insurance turns out to be unsustainable without government subsidies. More than half of the co-ops have been shut down this year, and nine of the 12 have shut down since October 1, either by HHS or by the states in which they operate.
“We are excited to reward the Larry David with $5,000 cash for ‘standing up’ to Donald Trump on Saturday Night Live and speaking the truth about his anti-Latino racism, even though he was joking,” Deport Racism campaign director Luke Montgomery said in the statement.
* Apocalypse watch: The Future of Climate Change Is Widespread Civil War.
* How did this ever get out of beta to begin with? Elon Musk Admits Humans Can’t Be Trusted with Tesla’s Autopilot Feature.
* Another scene from the death of the university.
* By substituting class relations for an arbitrary list of “privileges,” Voxis attempting to paint a picture of an immiserated America with no villain. It’s an America without a ruling class that directly and materially benefits from everyone else’s hard times. And this omission isn’t just incorrect — it robs us of any meaningful oppositional politics that could change it all.
* Hillary Clinton’s Announcement Paves Way for Progressives to Abandon Principles Very Early in 2016 Election. Hillary Clinton isn’t a champion of women’s rights. She’s the embodiment of corporate feminism. How Hillary Clinton’s State Department Sold Fracking to the World. The typeface.
* Why did it take the federal government so long to prosecute the Blackwater contractors who shot up a Baghdad square in 2007, killing and maiming scores of Iraqis? Because investigators were trying to wait out the Bush administration, which wanted to go easy on the killers, recently unearthed documents show.
* ‘Fuck Your Breath’ — Video Shows Cop Mocking Unarmed Man As He Dies From Police Bullet. This story is even more bizarre than you’d think. Black Men Being Killed Is The New Girls Gone Wild. Police have been setting up suspects with false testimony for decades. Is anyone going to believe them now when they tell the truth? Thousands dead, few prosecuted.
* The “zone of sacrifice” that is Oxnard, California, where low-income workers are paying the price for pesticide use and chemical dumping.
* Hate to judge it from a trailer, but Ant-Man sure seems pretty specifically not great.
* As Sinclair Lewis said, when fascism comes to America it will be wearing a Fitbit and offering you a discount on insurance.
* BREAKING: Your Brain Is Primed To Reach False Conclusions.
* I have a short piece up at the Cambridge UP blog: “We’re Sorry, the Final Frontier is Closed.” It talks a bit about the recent revival of space frontier and space opera fantasy in big-budget films like Jupiter Ascending, Guardians of the Galaxy, and Interstellar…
Now the trustees of Wayford Woods have announced ‘fairy control’ methods which will curb the “profusion of elfin construction”.
Trustee Steven Acreman said the trend was “in danger of getting out of control” but stressed he was not “anti-fairies”.
“It’s a very complex situation and nobody’s admitting that they’re evicting the fairies,” he said.
* “These beliefs persisted into recent times,” says Butler. “For example, in 1895 Michael Cleary convinced his family and community that his wife, Bridget, was a changeling. This was confirmed by a traditional fairy doctor, who attempted a herbal cure. When that didn’t work, they threatened her with fire, doused, and finally burned her to death.” Well, that’s certainly less charming.
* So by all means, criticize teachers when it is warranted. But resist education reformers at all costs, particularly when they rationalize their reforms as a way to address the problems of the teaching force. Education reformers, no matter their intentions, are the enemies of a unionized teaching force. They are the enemies of public education.
“The faculty and staff,” Mr. Brown said, “are feeling traumatized by this—not just by the loss of the institution, but by the way it has been handled. They seem to have no answers about anything, and that is what feels so deeply troubling.”
I hadn’t even thought about how impossible it will be for Sweet Briar faculty to sell their homes. What a nightmare.
* Who Gets the Endowment? I really hope higher ed media watches the dispersal of Sweet Briar’s endowment and property very closely.
Indeed, at the heart of the standard capitalist narrative is magic, as if the will to realize the abstract ideal of a cornucopia for all will itself — through fervent wishing and belief that can only be called religious — bring about the imagined state. It is the “invisible hand” idea from Adam Smith — the conviction that there really is a hidden force that given free rein sets everything aright. It is the God meme in capitalism and its writings, Smith’s among them, that is to capitalism what the Torah is to Judaism, the Gospels to Christianity, and the Koran to Islam: holy texts whose authenticity and reality must not be challenged or questioned unless as an adolescent moment of doubt, eventually subsumed by the re-embrace of total belief.
* I’ve always wanted a Trek anthology series. And with the ever-lowering cost of CGI effects it could be finally be done…
* In the short term, the contract faculty who teach the majority of courses at York University are striking for higher wages. In the long run, contract teaching needs to be abolished.
In some cases, regulation, not deliberative choice, has led campus leaders to rely on business advice. For example, the Taxpayer Bill of Rights II, signed into law in 1996, requires many of us to hire compensation consultants to ensure that “disqualified persons”—presidents, provosts, vice presidents for finance and administration, etc.—have not received an “excessive benefit” such as inappropriate compensation.In all situations that I have observed, this process has had unintended consequences. Using sophisticated tools developed for industry, the consultants have demonstrated that many higher-education leaders are undercompensated.
GASP! NO ONE COULD HAVE PREDICTED! I wonder if a “compensation consultant” has ever, in history, determined that a CEO was receiving “excessive benefit.”
* Raped on Campus? Don’t Trust Your College to Do the Right Thing. I’d see the story about Oregon’s admin raiding the campus health center for ammo to use against its own students, but I’d never seen the outrageous legal justification for it before now.
If you are a student and seek counseling at your college’s counseling center, your medical records are most likely not protected by the typical medical-privacy laws, otherwise known as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. Instead, they fall under the aegis of Ferpa, just as Oregon said. And compared with Hipaa, Ferpa is about as protective as cheesecloth.
* This Is What It’s Like To Go To Court In Ferguson, Missouri. DOJ Finds Ferguson Police Routinely Discriminate. Ferguson Police Tolerate Sexual Harassment of Female Officers. What Is Wrong With the Ferguson Police Department? Particular lowlights from the DoJ report.
* What’s happening here is fundamentally simple: the surveillance state enforcing surveillance as the normative form of care. The state cannot teach its citizens, because it has no idea what to teach; it can only place them under observation. Perfect observation — panopticism — then becomes its telos, which is justifies and universalizes by imposing a responsibility to surveil on the very citizens already being surveilled.
* More Companies Are Run By Men Named “John” Than By Women. Just lean in!
* A singular event that has never happened in history before: Kenosha officer admits to planting evidence in homicide case.
* 2016 watch: Bernie’s Reasons Why Not.
* In case you missed them: the syllabi for my spring classes, which start tomorrow.
* Meanwhile MLA saves its best panel for last: 759. Guilty Pleasures: Late Capitalism and Mere Genre. Today at 1:45!
* On March 11-12, 2015, the Humanities Division at Essex County College will host its Spring 2015 Conference, “Speculative Humanities: Steampunk to Afrofuturism.” This two-day conference offers space for writers, musicians, artists, and academicians to explore, expand upon, and rethink the implications of speculative humanities. This year’s conference will feature a special emphasis on the life, work, and influence of Octavia E. Butler.
* Really, though, huge shoutout to all the literary critics heading home today.
* #FreeCommunityCollege. Did Obama Just Introduce a ‘Public Option’ for Higher Education? Angus is happy. Who Has a Stake in Obama’s Free Community-College Plan? Of course, it’s a Republican plan. And there’s a catch. Or two.
Sometimes you don’t get a sales pitch. It’s none of your business, it’s reactionary to even ask the question, it’s an assertion of privilege, something’s got to be done and what have you been doing that’s better? Sometimes you get a sales pitch and it’s all about will and not about intellect: everybody has to believe in fairies or Tinkerbell will die. The increments sometimes make no sense. This leads to that leads to what? And what? And then? Why? Or perhaps most frustrating of all, each increment features its own underlying and incommensurable theories about why things happen in the world: in this step, people are motivated by self-interest; in the next step, people are motivated by basic decency; in the next step, people are motivated by fear of punishment. Every increment can’t have its own social theory. That’s when you know that the only purpose is the action itself, not the thing it’s trying to accomplish.
As leverage, Silvia Federici outlines the two-part process of demanding a wage for previously uncompensated labor. The first step is recognition, but the ultimate goal is refusal. “To say that we want money for housework” she says, “is the first step towards refusing to do it, because the demand for a wage makes our work visible, which is the most indispensable condition to begin to struggle against it, both in its immediate aspect as housework and its more insidious character as femininity” (Wages Against Housework). Another way to say this is: it is only with the option of refusal that not-publishing is meaningful.
It is clear that “publish or perish” is undergoing a speedup like all other capitalist work. We must all struggle for a re-valorization of living labor. And in the first step against publication’s command over living labor, we agree with Federici, who demands that “From now on we want money for each moment of it, so that we can refuse some of it and eventually all of it” (Wages Against Housework).
* New research is first to identify which reserves must not be burned to keep global temperature rise under 2C, including over 90% of US and Australian coal and almost all Canadian tar sands.
* Rave drug shows great promise in treating depression once thought resistant to drug therapy. I hope they found some way to control for the curative effects of glowsticks.
* The kids aren’t all right: Millennials Are Less Racially Tolerant Than You Think.
* And exciting loopholes I think we can all believe in: “He was doing research for a film,” said Sherrard. “It’s not a crime; it’s artwork… He’s an intellectual.”
As I get ready to head out to MLA, I thought I’d post my two new syllabi for this semester, HONORS 2953: Video Game Culture and ENGLISH 3000: Magic and Literature. (My Cultural Preservation course hasn’t changed all that much, but you can see the new website here.)
Here’s the meat of both, the week-by-week schedules, as well as the “What Is English 3000?” explanation for those who don’t know the history behind this course…
#1 ENGLISH 3000
WHAT IS ENGLISH 3000?
ENGLISH 3000 is a new course, emerging out of the English’s department recent redesign of its curriculum, which is intended to serve as a gateway to 4000-level study in the discipline (as well as in the humanities more generally). The previous major had tended to silo different historical periods, forms, genres, and methodological approaches each within their own courses, constructing an intellectually diverse curriculum primarily through the juxtaposition of the various course requirements. In contrast, the new major loosens those requirements and chooses instead to put the different perspectives together within a single course, in an effort to promote shared conversations and collective interests across the English major while also allowing students more freedom to define a course of study that truly matters to them. This, of course, is ENGLISH 3000, which was taught for the first time in Fall 2014.
The plan is for the ENGLISH 3000 sections to gather together a variety of literary forms (poetry, drama, prose fiction, film, and so on) from a variety of historical periods (ours runs from Shakespeare to Harry Potter) and explore them through a variety of critical perspectives and interpretive lenses (we study feminism, Marxism, postcoloniality, queer theory, genre theory, New Criticism, structuralism, disability studies, and reader response). Our conversations will thus become richer and denser as we go, as we build a shared vocabulary for our critical interventions. In the process, we will also be able to explore a number of the multiple writing styles and publishing venues that are available to literary-minded thinkers today: creative writing and academic writing, of course, but also journalistic writing, popular criticism, the personal blog, fan criticism, and even fan fiction. I hope you will find these examples inspirational as you think about the possibilities for your own writing in the future.
Professors teaching ENGLISH 3000 each choose some wide-ranging but ultimately unifying theme to structure their courses; while we might have studied literature and medicine, or literature and science, or literature and the law, the theme I have selected for our section of this course this semester is “magic and literature.” This theme is present in some way or another through every literary text we will encounter, from the vaunted heights of the literary canon to culturally suspect and supposedly frivolous works of genre fiction (again: Shakespeare to Harry Potter).
Although ENGLISH 3000 shares some similarities with our sophomore-level courses, including its consideration of multiple authors and historical periods and the use of a “theme” as an organizing principle, ENGLISH 3000 should not be thought of as an introductory or remedial course, nor as a free-form general-interest survey; rather, it is an opportunity for you to meet together as emerging literary scholars to figure out what you think defines (and what should define) literary study in the twenty-first century. The conversations we begin here will, I hope, ripple across all the courses you take in the English department at Marquette.
GENERAL COURSE PLAN
WEEKS 1-2: INTRODUCTIONS AND CONTROVERSIES: POETRY
Concepts: New Criticism, Structuralism
WEEK 3-5: DRAMA: THE TEMPEST
WEEK 6-8: NOVEL: ONE HUNDRED YEAR OF SOLITUDE
Concept: Marxism, Genre, Allegory, Utopia
WEEK 9: THE SHORT STORY: “THE YELLOW WALL-PAPER” AND “THE PROBLEM OF SUSAN”
WEEK 10-11: FILM: FROZEN
Concept: Cultural Studies, Queer Theory, Disability Studies, Reader Response
WEEK 12-16: YOUNG-ADULT LITERATURE: HARRY POTTER AND THE ORDER OF THE PHOENIX
|M||January 12||FIRST DAY OF CLASS|
|W||January 14||W.H. Auden, “So An Age Ended…” [D2L]
Arthur Rimbaud, “After the Flood” [D2L]
|M||January 19||MARTIN LUTHER KING DAY—NO CLASS|
|W||January 21||New Criticism
How To Interpret Literature: “New Criticism”
Robert Frost, “Mending Wall” [D2L]
How to Interpret Literature, “Structuralism”
Dan Harmon, “Story Circle 101” [online]
J.R.R. Tolkien, “On Fairy-Stories” [D2L]
in-class discussion: The Lord of the Rings (film and book)
|W||January 28||William Shakespeare, The Tempest, Act I|
|M||February 2||The Tempest, Acts II-III|
|W||February 4||The Tempest, Acts IV-V|
How to Interpret Literature, “Postcolonial and Race Studies”
Heather MacDonald, “The Humanities Have Forgotten Their Humanity” [online]
Natalia Cecire, “Humanities Scholarship Is Incredibly Relevant, and That Makes People Sad” [online]
|W||February 11||Postcolonial Commentary on The Tempest
George Lamming, “A Monster, A Child, A Slave”
Barbara Fuchs, “Conquering Islands: Contextualizing The Tempest”
|M||February 16||Gabriel García Márquez, One Hundred Years of Solitude, Chapters 1-5|
|W||February 18||Gabriel García Márquez, One Hundred Years of Solitude, Chapters 6-10|
|M||February 23||Gabriel García Márquez, One Hundred Years of Solitude, Chapters 11-15
FIRST PAPER DUE
|W||February 25||Gabriel García Márquez, One Hundred Years of Solitude, Chapters 16-20
Gabriel García Márquez, “The Solitude of Latin America”
How to Interpret Literature, “Marxism”
Gregory Lawrence, “Marx in Macondo” [D2L]
|W||March 4||Tools and Methods: Genre, Allegory, and Utopia
Fredric Jameson, “Radical Fantasy” [D2L]
Ursula K. Le Guin, “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas” [D2L]
|M||March 9||SPRING BREAK—NO CLASS|
|W||March 11||SPRING BREAK—NO CLASS|
Charlotte Perkins Gilman, “The Yellow Wall-Paper” [D2L]
How to Interpret Literature, “Feminism”
|W||March 18||The Chronicles of Narnia
C.S. Lewis, The Last Battle (excerpt) [D2L]
Neil Gaiman, “The Problem of Susan” [D2L]
SECOND PAPER DUE
|M||March 23||Cultural Studies
How to Interpret Literature, “Historicism and Cultural Studies”
David Forgacs, “Disney Animation and the Business of Childhood” [D2L]
Lili Loofbourow, “Just Another Princess Movie” [online]
|W||March 25||Queer Studies
How to Interpret Literature, “Queer Studies”
Google Search: “queer reading of Frozen” [Google]
|M||March 30||Disability Studies
How to Interpret Literature, “Disability Studies”
Su Holmes, “Cold and Hungry: Discourses of Anorexic Femininity in Frozen” [online]
ZebraGal, “Let It Go—Autism Version” [YouTube]
|W||April1||Readers and Fandoms
How to Interpret Literature, “Reader Response”
Henry Jenkins, “Transmedia Storytelling 101” [online]
|M||April 6||EASTER HOLIDAY—NO CLASS|
|W||April 8||J.K. Rowling, Harry Potter 1-4 review and discussion|
|M||April 13||J.K. Rowling, Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix|
|W||April 15||Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix|
|M||April 20||Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix|
|W||April 22||Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix|
|M||April 27||IN-CLASS WORKSHOP DAY FOR GROUP PRESENTATIONS|
|W||April 29||GROUP PRESENTATIONS|
|F||May 8||FINAL PAPER DUE VIA D2L DIGITAL DROPBOX BY 3 PM|
#2 VIDEO GAME CULTURE
|Tuesday, January 13||START||FIRST DAY OF CLASS|
|Tuesday, January 20||PLAY||Game: The Stanley Parable
Corey Mohler, Existential Comics: “Candyland and the Nature of the Absurd”
|Tuesday, January 27||RULES||Alexander Galloway, Gaming: “Gamic Action, Four Moments”|
|Tuesday, February 3||ART||Roger Ebert, “Doom,” “Critics vs. Games on Doom,” “Why Did The Chicken Cross the Genders,” “Video Games Can Never Be Art”
Ian Bogost, “Art”
|Tuesday, February 10||CRITIQUE||Game: Braid
Patrick Jagoda, “Fabulously Procedural: Braid, Historical Processing, and the Videogame Sensorium”
|Tuesday, February 17||COGNITION||Stephen Johnson, Everything Bad Is Good for You (excerpt)
Jane McGonigal, Reality Is Broken (excerpt)
|Tuesday, February 24||HABIT||Game: Tetris
Ian Bogost, “Habituation”
Chris Higgins, “Playing to Lose”
Sam Anderson, “Just One More Game…”
|Tuesday, March 3||OBSESSION||Film: The King of Kong|
|Tuesday, March 10||PAUSE||SPRING BREAK—NO CLASS|
|Tuesday, March 17||VIOLENCE||Game: Portal
Short: “Duty Calls”
Alexander Galloway, Gaming: “Origins of the First Person Shooter” and “Social Realism”
|Tuesday, March 24||MASCULINITY||Stephen Kline, Nick Dyer-Witheford, and Greig de Peuter, “Designing Militarized Masculinity: Violence, Gender, and the Bias of Game Experience”
Todd VanDerWerff, “#GamerGate: Here’s why everybody in the video game world is fighting”
|Tuesday, March 31||MASTERY||Game: FreeCiv
Alexander Galloway, Gaming: “Allegories of Control”
Trevor Owens, “Sid Meier’s Colonization: Is It Offensive Enough?”
u/Lycerius, “I’ve Been Playing the Same Game of Civilization II for Almost 10 Years. This Is the Result.”
|Tuesday, April 7||IDEOLOGY||Game: SimCity
Ava Kofman, “Les Simerables”
Mike Sterry, “The Totalitarian Buddhist Who Beat Sim City”
|Tuesday, April 14||FREEMIUM||Game: Candy Crush
Ramin Shokrizade, “The Top F2P Monetization Tricks”
June Thomas, “Sugar Coma”
Julia Lepetit and Andrew Bridgman, “The Most Realistic Game Ever”
Ian Bogost, “Rage Against the Machines” and Cow Clicker
|Tuesday, April 21||GAMIFICATION||Lifehacker, “Gamify Your Life: A Guide to Incentivizing Everything”
Michelle Greenwald, “Gamification in Everything”
Dan Schawbel, “How Gamification Is Going To Change The Workplace”
Ian Bogost, “Why Gamification Is Bullshit”
|Tuesday, April 28||COUNTERGAMING||Games: molleindustria.org
Alexander Galloway, Gaming: “Countergaming”
Classes start after my red-eye from Vancouver Sunday night…
* The Department of Education is surprisingly frank about how impossible it is to turn Obama’s gibberish on education into a usable ratings system. And here is the tentative list of stats colleges must now juke.
* Aaron Bady interviews Sofia Samatar on steampunk, Afrofuturism, science fiction, and more. The latest in his Post45 series.
* The best list like this I’ve seen: 5 Reasons To Study The Humanities.
Uber claims Done wasn’t even the driver who was supposed to pick the woman up, and points out that he passed a background check before he started driving for them.
So did the L.A. driver charged with kidnapping and rape, the San Francisco driver charged with hitting a passenger in the head with a hammer, and another San Francisco driver accused of assault who turned out to have prior felony convictions and was on parole for a previous battery charge.
* But in statehouses across the country, Uber has fought against legislation requiring background checks as strong as those demanded of traditional taxis. Other ride-sharing companies like Lyft and Sidecar, Uber’s chief rivals, have also pushed against the laws, but supporters of stronger background checks say Uber has been by far the most aggressive.
* The very last Colbert. RIP. Today marks the exact moment this stops being a relevant reference for students, so expect to see it fade from classrooms around 2027.