Gerry Canavan

the smartest kid on earth

Star Trek

with 4 comments

Call it the soft bigotry of low expectations or heretofore unexpected reserves of good will for the franchise—or maybe J.J. just nailed it—but I found Star Trek surprisingly good. And “good” is an amazing accomplishment given the self-contradictions inherent to the project:

1) innovate and revitalize a franchise that, let’s face it, is built almost entirely on the bedrock of nostalgic repetition;
2) do so while further hamstrung by the excruciating prequel format.

But Abrams strikes a more or less successful balance, aside from a few hamhanded “R2-D2, meet C-3PO” moments and a little too much handholding and lampshade-hanging.

As is probably to be expected, the prequelization provides both the worst parts of the movie and its primary source of narrative pleasure. As a certified member of the Nitpicker’s Guild I confess I was a bit annoyed to see how little effort was made to stick with the original continuity, even granting the timeline shift. Many of the gadgets had different behaviors and limitations than in the original show; no one knew Romulans were related to Vulcans until part of the way through the original series; Chekhov didn’t join the ship until later; Pike wasn’t the first captain of the Enterprise; etc, etc, etc. (You can fanwank most or all of these away with “The USS Kelvin Changed Everything,” but that’s not very satisfying. Clear lines of cause-and-effect matter, especially in time travel stories.)

That this cherished original continuity is essentially bulldozed permanently by the film is pretty unfortunate and will, I think, permanently damage the franchise in the eyes of its loyal and notoriously defensive fanbase, especially as fifty years of strict adherence to Roddenberry’s particular Utopian vision has not prepared them well for our heroes to lose a planet, much less the entire timeline.

But at the same time it is quite fun to see these characters meet each other, and Abrams does an amazing job of capturing the feel of the original series (all the way from aesthetics right down to the level of contrivance and occasionally nonsensical plot points). That the actors playing McCoy and (especially) Spock are very good mimics of the original actors helps things along a lot as well.

It’s also astounding how apolitical the film tries to be; I went in with the idea of writing a post about neoliberalism and Star Trek and it just didn’t give me much to work with. Now, this is a neoliberal, United Nations fantasy of the future, to be sure, in which difference only exists to be flattened out—but that’s really true of almost all Trek, DS9 and some other choice episodes excepted. (There’s also a making explicit of the longstanding metaphorical connection between Vulcans and Jews, with a Vulcan Holocaust followed by a choice between diaspora, assimilation, and resettlement in a “new colony,” but I don’t know what to do with that yet.)

Star Trek (2009) is no better or worse, politically speaking, than what Star Trek‘s always been: a fantasy of what the world would be like if consumer capitalism had no labor or environmental costs and American military-cultural hegemony was pure, stable, and uncomplicatedly good. It remains our defining ideological fantasy, in other words, the thing that blinds us still to the sort of world we’re really living in and the sort of future we’re actually creating.

So it’s no surprise that at this point my thoughts turn to the mediocre, to the unchosen, to the radicals and the subaltern and the dissidents. What becomes of difference in this future? We see these people only sometimes, in the background: Sisko’s dad, Picard’s brother. Usually they exist only to be made Star Fleet officers or good Federation citizens by the end of the episode, and we see no one like this in this movie at all. The lack of flexibility in this narrative template has grown, I think, exhausting, and it’s for this reason that over the years I find myself much more drawn to presentist and mundane SF, or apocalyptic futurity, or to anti-Trek futures like Firefly, the first few seasons of BSG, or Samuel Delany’s Triton.

But all the same every so often it’s nice to come home again.

Just one request: no more product placement, please; there’s no money in the future, much less corporations…

4 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Well, certainly it wasn’t *economically* political; as you say, no money. But when I saw it in the theaters, I was in full-on culture war mode.

    zunguzungu

    July 13, 2010 at 5:06 pm

  2. I just republished this to fix the formatting; it must have shown up in your feed…

    I like the full-on-edness of your culture war mode, that’s a good post.

    gerrycanavan

    July 13, 2010 at 5:08 pm

  3. Oh, that’s funny. I was wondering why you were just getting around to watching the movie, but I was too delicate to mention it.

    I wonder if Charlie X was the original show’s way of representing the excluded mediocrity? Girls don’t like him so he lashes out with rage!

    zunguzungu

    July 13, 2010 at 5:16 pm

  4. Hah, it just showed up in my feed, too, and now I can’t resist commenting.

    To me, the greatest disappointment was the introduction of the Spock/Uhura romance, not because I don’t like Spock/Uhura in and of itself (I actually prefer it to Spock/Kirk now…) but because the introduction of Spock/anyone into the canon makes Spock/Kirk so much more problematic in fanfiction. Every K/S fic now has to somehow “deal with” Uhura, a situation I hate in any fandom because the erasure, betrayal, or dumping of “the girlfriend” is so often tinged with misogyny. There’s a new generation of Trek fans and a new flood of Trek fic, now that it only takes two hours to learn all the canon, but it’s tainted.

    The introduction of a romance bothers me more in Trek than in most places, though, because the creators of the reboot had to know that Kirk/Spock is enormous. To rule it out by introducing Uhura/Spock feels like a deliberate assertion of heteronormativity and a fresh reminder that gay people are still not included in Trek’s (formerly) radically inclusive universe. Which stings.

    On the plus side, now we have Uhura/Gaila, which I’m pretty sure is new, and it’s awesome!

    eloriane

    July 14, 2010 at 1:04 pm


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: