Posts Tagged ‘monkeys’
Thursday Night! Drones, The Swedish Chef, Cross-Dressing Dads, and More
* Texas and Florida get told they can’t suppress the vote.
* Swedes think the Swedish Chef sounds Norwegian.
* Dad sports skirt to support cross-dressing son.
* Getting Rid of the College Loan Repo Man.
* Jonathan Chait: The Legendary Paul Ryan.
* A Brazilian judge has recognized a three-way marriage.
* And from monkey utopia to monkey hell: Chimps don’t care if someone else gets robbed.
Links from a Crazy Pair of Days
* North Carolina invites you to tour beautiful Panem.
* What if Spider-Man fought in Vietnam?
* The case for ending medical research on chimps.
* Limiting principles. More limiting principles. A TPM reader says the endgame will be Roberts writing one. Reagan’s solicitor general: ‘Health care is interstate commerce. Is this a regulation of it? Yes. End of story.’ A study of SCOTUS oral arguments says the odds could still in the White House’s favor. Is The Right Getting Punk’d By SCOTUS On ‘Obamacare’? But some Democrats are already turning to their favorite consolation fantasy, winning by losing.
* Meanwhile, House Republicans just voted to end Medicare (in an election year).
‘In 2008 the Spanish Parliament Came to a Similar Conclusion for Great Apes That Would Grant Limited Personhood Rights to Nonhuman Animals for the First Time So That … They “Should Enjoy the Right to Life, Freedom and Not to Be Tortured”‘
What would it mean to grant personhood to whales, dolphins, monkeys, and great apes? Scientific American reports. There’s also this bit:
This is not as radical an idea as it may sound. The law is fully capable of making and unmaking “persons” in the strictly legal sense. For example, one Supreme Court case in 1894 (Lockwood, Ex Parte 154 U.S. 116) decided that it was up to the states “to determine whether the word ‘person’ as therein used [in the statute] is confined to males, and whether women are admitted to practice law in that commonwealth.” As atrocious as this ruling sounds, such a precedent continued well into the twentieth century and, in 1931, a Massachusetts judge ruled that women could be denied eligibility to jury status because the word “person” was a term that could be interpreted by the court.
1931!
Photo of the Day
On the morning of January 31, 1961, a 5-year-old chimpanzee named “Ham” ate a breakfast of baby cereal, condensed milk, vitamins, and half an egg. Then the playful 37-pound primate went out into the Cape Canaveral light and made aeronautic history: Aboard a NASA space capsule — traveling almost 160 miles above the Earth — he became the first chimp in space. Via Tumblr.
A Few for Sunday
Some of these I first saw at the triumphant return of zunguzungu’s Sunday Reading. You may have also seen his piece “The Grass Is Closed” on the arbitrariness of power this weekend, already linked everywhere.
* Chapel Hill anarchists occupy downtown building. Occupy Minnesota protestors occupy foreclosed home.
* UC groups endorse November 15 strike.
* An interview with Susie Cagle.
* The moral clarity of empire:
It’s over 800 billion dollars that we have expended [in Iraq]. I believe that Iraq should pay us back for the money that we spent, and I believe that Iraq should pay the families that lost a loved one several million dollars per life, I think at minimum.
* The Culturally Biased SAT: Hip-Hop Edition.
* From last week, but now more than ever: “Italy is now the biggest story in the world.”
* Except for this one: When do we hit the point of no return for climate change?
And, as the IEA found, we’re about five years away from building enough carbon-spewing infrastructure to lock us in and make it extremely difficult — maybe impossible — to avoid 450 ppm. The point of no return comes around 2017.
* Fat primates rejoice! Obese Monkeys Lose Weight on Drug that Attacks Blood Supply of Fat Cells.
* And I saw this the other day, but forgot to post it: Sam Harris on self-defense.
This is the core principle of self-defense: Do whatever you can to avoid a physical confrontation, but the moment avoidance fails, attack explosively for the purposes of escape—not to mete out justice, or to teach a bully a lesson, or to apprehend a criminal. Your goal is to get away with minimum trauma (to you), while harming your attacker in any way that seems necessary to ensure your escape.
Stay safe out there.
Horizons of Legal Theory
Who owns the copyright on a photo taken by a monkey? Jason Kottke reports.










